Re: [blogite] Pingback makes a page invalid?

From: gilmaevski (gilmaevski@mail.ru)
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 11:51:15 BST

• Next message: Simon Willison: "[blogite] A decentralised "my blog has been updated" service"
• Previous message: Simon Willison: "[blogite] Before we update the spec..."
• In reply to: Stuart Langridge: "Re: [blogite] Pingback makes a page invalid?"

Stuart Langridge wrote:

> What? That's *it*? I assumed that anyone who'd elected to choose XHTML
> as their language would know that their tags had to be terminated!
> Grumble. I thought maybe it was some kind of undeclared LINK tag or
> something, and was puzzled why this was so.
>
> Should I mention in the spec that you need to format the tag
> appropriately for your choice of document language? (Didn't think I'd
> need to do this *sigh*)

first question for the Pingback FAQ

g.

Message sent over the Blogite mailing list.
Archives: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/archives/blogite/
Instructions: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/blogite/

• Next message: Simon Willison: "[blogite] A decentralised "my blog has been updated" service"
• Previous message: Simon Willison: "[blogite] Before we update the spec..."
• In reply to: Stuart Langridge: "Re: [blogite] Pingback makes a page invalid?"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 13:05:00 BST