Re: [blogite] Thoughts on the updated spec

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Ian Hickson (ian@hixie.ch)
Date: Sun Sep 08 2002 - 16:20:17 BST

On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> [...]

Ok, I'll add error codes and X-Pingback.

Question. Should X-Pingback processing be optional, or should all clients
look for that HTTP header?

If we make it optional, then we have the problem that some clients would
use the <link> element, and some would use the HTTP header. That would be
bad. Comments? 

-- 
Ian Hickson                                      )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
"meow"                                          /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
http://index.hixie.ch/                         `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Message sent over the Blogite mailing list.
Archives:     http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/archives/blogite/
Instructions: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/blogite/
Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 09 2002 - 05:05:00 BST