From: Ian Hickson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Sep 08 2002 - 16:20:17 BST
On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Simon Willison wrote:
Ok, I'll add error codes and X-Pingback.
Question. Should X-Pingback processing be optional, or should all clients
look for that HTTP header?
If we make it optional, then we have the problem that some clients would
use the <link> element, and some would use the HTTP header. That would be
-- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' Message sent over the Blogite mailing list. Archives: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/archives/blogite/ Instructions: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/blogite/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 09 2002 - 05:05:00 BST