From: Jim Dabell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Sep 08 2002 - 19:29:31 BST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Saturday 07 September 2002 5:44 pm, Aquarion wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 06:06:01PM +0100, Simon Willison wrote:
> > I've got a solution. Unfortunately it uses XML namespaces - is this a
> > big problem?
> My main problem with it would be that it appears to change the
> implementation of pingback from one single <link> to a forty page XML
> file, with excess detail on everything.
A bit of an exaggeration, don't you think? :)
> The whole point of the original
> spec was that all the client had to do was send off a single RPC-XML
> request saying it was linked to. This is quick, this is efficent, this
> is /easy/.
It's also non-extendable. Doing the exact same thing, except grabbing the
xml file to get the location of the rpc file is not that much different
(assuming no namespaces).
> XML-RPC is a nice standard, it's an /easy/ standard, and it was
> /designed/ for things like this. It also needs more people to know it
> exists. The fact that you *could* use alternatives is valid, but then
> again you *could* use Trackback, and the whole point of this was that
> Trackback was an overengineered solution to a fairly simple problem.
XML-RPC isn't as easy to implement (imho) as grabbing an email address out
of an xml file and firing off an email saying "Hey! I've linked to you!".
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Message sent over the Blogite mailing list.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 09 2002 - 00:05:00 BST