From: Ian Hickson (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Sep 09 2002 - 20:17:43 BST
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Stuart Langridge wrote:
>> Here's my "case for complexity". [...]
I totally agree with your arguments for simplicity.
> I think the distinction, as I've said elsewhere, is that these other
> methods of pingback should be being implemented as layers on top of
> Pingback rather than as an integral part of the spec.
> I can see users who are writing Pingback code but don't want to use
> XML-RPC doing a GET on
Indeed they can already do this using my client-proxy, as documented here:
This will even do the auto-discovery for you (including the HTTP header).
> Or going to a form on that server which then calls that very page.
I should do that someday really...
-- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' Message sent over the Blogite mailing list. Archives: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/archives/blogite/ Instructions: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/blogite/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 09 2002 - 21:05:01 BST