From: Ian Hickson (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 17:33:58 BST
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, michel v wrote:
> A little problem that I have with the pingback spec is that it forces
> you to tell the absolute URL of the pingback server, while a relative
> URL could be handled without much effort by pingback clients.
Without much effort?
You have to parse:
<meta> tags for Content-Location
<meta> tags for Content-Base
HTML <base href>
...along with everything that implies (including correctly parsing the
HTML and XML tree to get past any comments, etc).
That is incredibly _non_-trivial.
What advantage do we gain which would outweight the disadvantages?
-- Ian Hickson )\._.,--....,'``. fL "meow" /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. http://index.hixie.ch/ `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' Message sent over the Blogite mailing list. Archives: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/archives/blogite/ Instructions: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/blogite/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 19 2002 - 18:05:00 BST