From: Simon Willison (simon@incutio.com)
Date: Sat Sep 07 2002 - 13:16:49 BST
At 13:52 07/09/2002 +0200, mort wrote:
>I think using "pingbacks" as a label for the pingbacks link or list in a
>weblog is not really useful. "Comments" is self-explanatory, but,
>outside the ¿12? people in the world aware of pingback development, why
>sould anyone click in a unknown word like "pingback" or in a link filed
>under "pingbacks"?
On my blog, I'm hoping they'll click it out of curiosity ;)
>So, suggestions to talk-about-pingbacks-without-saying-the-word ;)
>
>1) Further reading on today’s posts
>2) External comments to this post
>3) What other people are writing about this post
>4) (x) other people have considered this post worthy to write about
I like 3 (or variations on it) best. I'm sticking with PingBack for the
moment mainly to help promote the idea, but I agree it's not the most
intuitive way of describing the system.
Cheers,
Simon
-- Web Developer, www.incutio.com Weblog: http://www.bath.ac.uk/~cs1spw/blog/ Message sent over the Blogite mailing list. Archives: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/archives/blogite/ Instructions: http://www.aquarionics.com/misc/blogite/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Sep 07 2002 - 16:05:00 BST